Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 02:21
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Researchers get viable mice by editing DNA from two sperm - Ars Technica
What’s next?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Why do I get spun and then want big fat cocks to suck?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Observations of recently detected SN 2024aecx suggest it's a Type IIb supernova - Phys.org
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Mario Kart World 1.1.0 update out now, patch notes - Nintendo Everything
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Thank you.
What are some very specific groups of people you just cannot stand?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.